| 6 results - showing 1 - 6 | Results per page: |
| Overall rating: | 9.8 | |
| Ease of Initial Setup: | 10.0 | |
| Quality of Support: | 10.0 | |
| Overall Ease of Use: | 10.0 | |
| Overall Value: | 10.0 | |
| Overall Satisfaction: | 9.0 | |
| Would recommend to a friend: | 10.0 |
| Price Paid | 20% Off |
| Pros | Automatic. Unattended. |
| Cons | Doesn't back up certain directories without manual override. Occasionally the Carbonite Service will eat up resources. If you pause it, it'll come back fine. |
| Product(s) Used | Carbonite Online Backup |
| Overall rating: | 7.9 | |
| Ease of Initial Setup: | 10.0 | |
| Ease of Implementation Into Practice: | 8.0 | |
| Staff Acceptance: | 8.0 | |
| Quality of Support: | 8.0 | |
| Has all the features I need: | 9.0 | |
| Overall Ease of Use: | 7.0 | |
| Overall Value: | 7.0 | |
| Overall Satisfaction: | 7.0 | |
| Would recommend to a friend: | 7.0 |
| Price Paid | 329 |
| Length of Ownership | 6-8mos |
| Would buy again? | No |
| Pros | The hardware is great, consistent, reliable. Lots of driver choices. Small footprint. |
| Cons | The software the comes with it is second-rate at best. Duplex requires their software. If you scan to pdf, it saves as both jpg and pdf, so you have to clean it up later. |
| Overall rating: | 9.9 | |
| Ease of Initial Setup: | 10.0 | |
| Ease of Implementation Into Practice: | 10.0 | |
| Staff Acceptance: | 10.0 | |
| Has all the features I need: | 9.0 | |
| Overall Ease of Use: | 10.0 | |
| Overall Value: | 10.0 | |
| Overall Satisfaction: | 10.0 | |
| Would recommend to a friend: | 10.0 |
This is our primary scanner. We've scanned several thousand charts on this and it hasn't blinked.
| Price Paid | $1450 |
| Length of Ownership | 11mos |
| Would buy again? | Yes |
| Pros | REALLY fast, very few double-feeds, will ignore a staple, good software, auto-detects color |
| Cons | Price, not flatbed (6240 is) |
| Overall rating: | 8.5 | |
| Ease of Initial Setup: | 9.0 | |
| Ease of Implementation Into Practice: | 9.0 | |
| Staff Acceptance: | 8.0 | |
| Has all the features I need: | 9.0 | |
| Overall Ease of Use: | 8.0 | |
| Overall Value: | 9.0 | |
| Overall Satisfaction: | 8.0 | |
| Would recommend to a friend: | 8.0 |
| Price Paid | $620 |
| Length of Ownership | 18mos |
| Would buy again? | Yes |
| Pros | Footprint (smaller than a netbook), 11x17 scanning, PDF + OCR on the FLY!, color |
| Cons | buggy software (not that bad), uses tabletop to hold the paper |
| Overall rating: | 8.3 | |
| Ease of Initial Setup: | 9.0 | |
| Ease of Implementation Into Practice: | 8.0 | |
| Has all the features I need: | 8.0 | |
| Overall Ease of Use: | 8.0 | |
| Overall Value: | 8.0 | |
| Overall Satisfaction: | 9.0 | |
| Would recommend to a friend: | 8.0 |
| Price Paid | $289 |
| Length of Ownership | 18mos |
| Would buy again? | Yes |
| Pros | ADF, Large flatbed (8.5x14), one-click scanning, inexpensive ($240 July 09) |
| Cons | Slow, footprint |
| Overall rating: | 6.9 | |
| Ease of Initial Physical Setup: | 4.0 | |
| Ease of Implementation Into Practice: | 8.0 | |
| Intuitiveness of Exam Portion: | 6.0 | |
| Speed of Data Input: | 6.0 | |
| Easily Customizable Interface: | 7.0 | |
| Has a Pleasing 'Look and Feel': | 8.0 | |
| Quality of Scheduling System: | 8.0 | |
| Easy to Update and Maintain : | 8.0 | |
| Quality of Financial Reports: | 6.0 | |
| Staff Acceptance: | 8.0 | |
| Favorable Licensing Terms: | 9.0 | |
| Has all the features I need: | 6.0 | |
| Quality of Support: | 7.0 | |
| Overall Ease of Use: | 7.0 | |
| Overall Value: | 8.0 | |
| Overall Satisfaction: | 6.0 | |
| Would Recommend to a Friend: | 6.0 |
| Experience | 1 - 3 Years |
| Professional Setting | Optometry |
| Owner or User? | I bought and use(d) this product |
| Your Status | Doctor |
| Disclosure | I do have an affiliation with an EHR company |
| Explain disclosure (only if needed) | MVE user and ECPManager partner |
| What do you like? | Good licensing, nice staff. 6mo updates are sufficient |
| What needs work? | Serious setup can take days. V8.0 fixed many of the issues and features the userbase asked for 1-2yrs ago. Reporting and datamining leave practice management challenging, mainly because of database structure. |
| 6 results - showing 1 - 6 |